International

Why bad emissions accounting undermines climate action

Undermining Climate Action: The Role of Poor Emissions Accounting

Accurate emissions accounting is the foundation of effective climate policy, corporate climate strategies, and investor decision-making. When emissions are misstated, omitted, or double-counted, the result is not merely technical error: it warps incentives, delays mitigation, misdirects finance, and erodes public trust. Below I explain how and why poor accounting matters, give concrete examples and data, and outline practical fixes.What good emissions accounting is supposed to doGood accounting should consistently capture greenhouse gas (GHG) sources and sinks, assign roles across stakeholders and actions, monitor advancement toward established goals, and support claims that can be compared and independently validated. Achieving this depends…
Read More
Why protectionism returns during uncertain times

How Uncertain Times Fuel Protectionist Policies

Uncertainty—whether from financial crises, pandemics, geopolitical clashes, or sudden technological change—creates pressures that push governments and voters toward protectionist policies. Protectionism surfaces as a response to fear, political incentives, and strategic calculation. This article explains the forces that revive protectionism in bad times, illustrates them with historical and recent cases, examines economic mechanisms and consequences, and outlines policy options that can reduce the temptation to retreat behind trade barriers.Past patterns and more recent examplesProtectionism is far from a recent oddity. The 1930s Smoot-Hawley tariffs stand as a defining illustration: the United States boosted duties in a bid to protect local…
Read More
Why climate lawsuits are increasing worldwide

Climate Change Litigation: A Global Trend on the Rise

Societies are increasingly turning to the courts to confront climate change, and the past decade has seen a sharp rise in climate‑related litigation fueled by escalating impacts, more robust scientific links between emissions and damage, evolving legal arguments, activist tactics, and changes in corporate and financial governance; this article outlines the primary drivers behind these cases, the legal avenues plaintiffs pursue, key illustrative examples, emerging geographic trends, and the practical implications for governments, businesses, and communities.Core drivers behind the rise in climate litigationClearer scientific attribution: Advances in attribution science and climate modeling make it increasingly possible to link specific extreme…
Read More
What safeguards exist in modern nuclear power

Exploring the Resurgence of Nuclear Energy Debate

Nuclear power has once again moved to the forefront of global public and policy discussions, driven by a convergence of factors such as climate commitments, energy security needs, technological progress, market developments, and evolving public sentiment, shifting the conversation from ideological arguments to practical considerations about balancing deep decarbonization with dependable electricity generation.Key drivers behind renewed attentionClimate commitments: Governments and corporations pursuing mid-century net-zero goals increasingly require substantial volumes of dependable, low‑carbon power. With its almost negligible operational CO2 emissions, nuclear is positioned to deliver both baseload and adaptable electricity to advance the electrification of transport, industry, and heating.Energy security…
Read More