are there fewer ‘disruptive’ discoveries than a century ago?
Science is no longer what it used to be. Now, although much more research is done, discoveries are less disruptive that in the past Patents serve, in the best of cases, to consolidate something that already existed. yeah I know there are no advances that manage to blow up prior knowledge as happened, for example, with the discovery of the double helix of DNA. This is the forceful premise that defends, with more than a hundred years of data in hand, an analysis posted this wednesday in the scientific magazine 'Nature'. With the publication of this article, the debate is…
