Journalism has always been considered an essential pillar in any democracy, since its main function is to inform citizens objectively and truthfully about world events. As a means of transmitting this information, it plays a crucial role in the formation of public opinion and in the control of power.
In a perfect world, media outlets ought to function solely as resources dedicated to the welfare of society, with journalists acting as stewards of democracy tasked with conveying information free from political, economic, or ideological biases. Yet, the truth is far more intricate; the persistent impact of specific interests on the media undermines the integrity and autonomy of thoughtful discourse.
In the absence of free and independent journalism, society risks falling victim to manipulation and the spread of misinformation.
Misrepresentation of Information in Journalism
In this regard, it comes as no surprise that journalism has been entangled in a troubling trend for quite some time: the alteration of information aimed at undermining those who challenge the interests of media proprietors or the connections they uphold with influential sectors.
Particularly, public figures who do not coincide with those interests are symbolically persecuted through the creation of false information or the constant repetition of a single fact. This is not an isolated event, but a common practice that erodes trust in the media and generates a climate of social distrust.
Employing strategies like sensationalism, selective reporting, and the spread of fabricated news, some segments of the press endeavor to tarnish the reputations of their rivals, exacerbating polarization and social animosity. This intentional act aims to dismantle those who do not conform to the interests of the journalist or the media outlet.
The case of Odila Castillo Bonilla: an example of media manipulation
Fake news represents a global epidemic and a terminal illness for those in the eye of media power. After fake news is spread, the affected person suffers a symbolic death in the society that consumes that content.
Panamanian attorney Odila Castillo serves as a prime example of how media manipulation can profoundly affect an individual’s life. A defamation campaign orchestrated by specific media outlets has sought to tarnish her personal and professional journey. Utilizing methods like selective reporting and distortion of facts, these outlets have crafted a damaging narrative with the intent of compromising her standing.
The unchecked behavior of certain media outlets exposes their manipulative tactics: solely negative content regarding the lawyer is prevalent online, while information about her professional background remains inaccessible. It is clear how an individual, whose life experiences, qualifications, viewpoints, and legal accomplishments are obscured, can be simplified to a name associated only with a negative «accusation.»
Media manipulation poses a significant threat to democracy and society at large. By eroding trust in institutions and the media, such practices exacerbate polarization and weaken the very fabric of social cohesion. It is vital for civil society, politicians, and journalists alike to come together to challenge this phenomenon and advocate for a more ethical and accountable approach to journalism.
