Higher education and civil rights leaders fear the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling could embolden “those with hate on their minds” to disenfranchise students of color attending elite universities.
Speaking to reporters on Friday morning, Leaders across the country responded to the ruling that selective colleges and universities cannot use race as a factor in admissions. They also outlined what the decision does and does not mean for students and higher education institutions.
“The court effectively ended a 45-year precedent,” he said. tom saenzPresident and General Counsel of the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, better known as MALDEF.
“We must all be clear that the decision of the majority takes us that far,” he added.
Although the Supreme Court ruled that the affirmative action programs at the University of North Carolina and Harvard violated the Constitution’s equal protection clause by considering race as a factor in the university admissions process, nothing in the decision it indicates “that somehow the Harvard and UNC systems fail to identify students who had every right and deserved admission to those institutions like any other,” Saenz said.
“It’s important to note because there will be those with hate in their minds who will seek to tell Black and Latino students who attend selective institutions that the Supreme Court says they don’t belong. That is false,” Saenz said. “Every current black, Latino student, student of any race, deserves and belongs where he is.”
J. Lucas WoodThe incoming president of California State University, Sacramento, said he anticipates “there will be an increase in hate” on campuses across the country as a result of the Supreme Court decision.
That’s why leaders agreed Friday that it’s more important than ever for universities to make sure all students feel like they belong on campus. They said they intend to do so by publicly embracing diversity and inclusion, as well as rejecting and condemning racism.
As leaders assured students like Agustín León-Sáenz, a sophomore at Harvard, that they belong on campus, many students on the school’s campus Thursday raised concerns about how the ruling will affect aspiring college students of color. .
“This is literally a lot at stake for my family,” León-Sáenz told MSNBC. He said he thinks about how it will affect his little brother, who will apply to college in a few years, and his cousin, who will apply to college in the fall. He makes her think of “the people in my community, specifically the state of New Mexico, where I’m one of two students from New Mexico in my school year. So this has an immediate impact.”
Higher education experts have suggested that expanding recruiting efforts to include different types of high schools, creating pipeline programs to recruit community college students, and minimizing reliance on standardized test scores are some of the ways that elite schools affected by the decision may mitigate some of the problems. their efects.
“I hope that Harvard, as soon as it can, can increase the recruitment of students from underrepresented minorities,” added León-Sáenz. “That, specifically to me, looks like going to communities in New Mexico that are indigenous, recruiting students of all nationalities and backgrounds to come.”
NBC News and MSNBC share a parent company, NBCUniversal.
The leaders stressed to reporters Friday that while the ruling specifically focuses on banning race as a factor in admissions, it does not limit a university’s ability to implement outreach, engagement and retention programs aimed at enrolling diverse bodies. students.
But still, “legal opinions can be interpreted very differently depending on how institutions perceive risk,” said Wood, a former director of diversity.
In his experience, “this just serves as a gateway to other conversations and pushbacks” that can affect college admissions, faculty hiring, scholarships, fundraising, student support services, and retention efforts. that are specifically designed for underrepresented communities, Wood said.
For this reason, the federal government and the Department of Education will have an important role in providing guidance to higher education institutions on how parts of the Supreme Court decision should be interpreted, Saenz said.
Sally Chenmanager of the education equity program at Chinese for Affirmative Action, said she hopes this moment will serve as a gateway “to challenge the idea that college is a zero-sum game” or the idea that “if someone gets a place, someone else loses a place.”
“If we accept that logic, we will always be working in a framework where education is earned rather than a public good,” Chen said.
